Отправляет email-рассылки с помощью сервиса Sendsay

поясните отчет валидатора

Содержание отчета W3C Markup Validator:

This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!

Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness and validity.
Error Line 67 column 62: document type does not allow element "div" here; missing
one of "object", "applet", "map", "iframe", "button", "ins", "del" start-tag.
..://www.lenin-soft.com"><div id="logo"></div></a>&copy; Лесоиндустр

The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which you've
placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that are both allowed
there and can contain the element mentioned. This might mean that you need a
containing element, or possibly that you've forgotten to close a previous element.

One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted to put a block-level
element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an inline element (such as "<a>",
"<span>", or "<font>").

Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness and validity.
Error Line 67 column 62: document type does not allow element "div" here; missing
one of "object", "applet", "map", "iframe", "button", "ins", "del" start-tag.
..://www.lenin-soft.com"><div id="logo"></div></a>&copy; Лесоиндустр

The mentioned element is not allowed to appear in the context in which you've
placed it; the other mentioned elements are the only ones that are both allowed
there and can contain the element mentioned. This might mean that you need a
containing element, or possibly that you've forgotten to close a previous element.

One possible cause for this message is that you have attempted to put
a block-level element (such as "<p>" or "<table>") inside an inline element (such
as "<a>", "<span>", or "<font>").

Поясните пожалуйста реакцию валидатора. Он нашел единственную ошибку,
не могу понять ее сути. И почему "This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0
Transitional!" ?

МАКС



библиотекa сайтостроительства http://www.i2r.ru/static/244/

Ответить   Mon, 18 Dec 2006 23:30:20 +0200 (#621966)